RSJ Technical Consulting
Helping you manage environmental reporting

 Home     Our team     Contact us     RSJ sales     RSJ services     RSJ tutorial

News Briefs:

New EU adds eight new substances to the REACH candidate list June 2010

New California updates Prop 65 chemical list April 2010

New JIG-101 edition 3.0 released March 2010

New IPC issues new 175X family of declaration standards February 2010

EU amends list of ELV exemptions February 2010

CPSIA issues new timeline for testing of children's products December 2009


EU expands scope of its Ecodesign Directives to energy-related products October 2009

China proposes 'the catalog' for RoHS Phase 2 October 2009

China plans expansion of PEANCS (new chemical substances) June 2009

EU recommends first list of substances requiring authorization under REACH April 2009

California approves the Green Chemistry Initiative September 2008

NGO ChemSec releases 'SIN' list (Substitute It Now) September 2008

US adopts CPSIA for lead & phthalates in children's products and for lead paint August 2008

EU Court of Justice ends decaBDE exemption for RoHS April 2008


EU releases draft of proposed RoHS changes (known as RoHS2) 2008

EU considers adding medical devices and monitoring & control instruments to RoHS

EU considers adding new prohibited substances to RoHS

RoHS2 would rely upon standards developed by European standards organizations

EU releases its study on the 'simplification' of RoHS


EU releases its study of the costs and benefits of RoHS


Eight EU Member States are cited for RoHS & WEEE transposition failures

California governor vetoes bill to expand RoHS October 2007

Northeastern US states propose Model Electronic Recycling Act 


                    top

What is Proposition 65?

Proposition 65: Safe Drinking Water Act of 1986
Chemicals List - Apr 2010
Safe Harbor Levels - Feb 2009

Clear & Reasonable Warnings

Approved by California voters during the 1986 general election, Proposition 65 is formally known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. Key provisions of the Act are summarized below:

A list of chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity must be published annually by the governor of California. Currently, the list is 18 pages long and includes approximately 775 chemicals, which are listed alphabetically by chemical name, CAS number, date of listing (or delisting), and toxicity type.

Businesses are prohibited from discharging listed chemicals into water (or onto land where it is likely to pass into the drinking water).

Businesses are required to provide warnings to individuals who are exposed to listed chemicals in the course of their business. The required warning is general and need not even specify the name of the chemical: "WARNING: This product (or area) contains a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm."

Since the legislation is targeted at all California businesses, the scope is much broader than product safety legislation such as RoHS, REACH or CPSIA (which is targeted to manufacturers and importers). Building owners, retail establishments and workplaces are liable for environmental exposure to listed chemicals in the ambient air, indoor air, drinking water, standing water, running water, soil, vegetation, manmade substances or natural substances. Typically excluded products such as food, restaurant meals, alcoholic beverages and prescription drugs are included.

Safe harbor levels are calculated in terms of daily intake levels through inhalation, ingestion or skin contact. Unlike RoHS, there are no maximum concentration levels below which a listed chemical may safely occur in a product. It is the amount of human exposure to the chemical, not the amount of the chemical in the product itself, that is controlling.

Proposition 65 is enforced by lawsuits filed against businesses. Although the California attorney general has primary responsibility, lawsuits have been filed by district attorneys, city attorneys, consumer advocacy groups, and private citizens/law firms. Penalties for failing to provide the required warnings can be as high as $2,500 per violation per day.

This summary is intended to give you an easy-to-understand overview and does not constitute legal advice. The actual standard in the original language should be reviewed and used for all business, legal, and product compliance purposes.

Should you need assistance in assessing how California environmental regulations will affect your manufacturing company, we stand ready to help you. Just email us or give us a call at 972-679-8996 for a timely and personalized response.

top

Copyright © 2010 -- All Rights Reserved
RSJ Technical Consulting
PO Box 867705, Plano, Texas 75086

Quick Tutorial:

    STANDARDS:    
What are Standards?
New What is JIG-101?
New What is IPC-1752?
What is the IEC?
What is TC 111?

What is the WTO?
What is TBT?

       USA:        What is CPSIA?
CPSIA timeline
CPSIA exemptions

What is California REACH?
What is California RoHS?
What is California WEEE?

What is Proposition 65?


      EUROPE:     

What is ELV?
      ELV exemptions

What is IMDS?

What is GADSL?

Compare IMDS vs RoHS

What is EuP?
What is ErP?
What is Ecodesign?
Implement. Measures

What is
REACH?
What are SVHCs?
      Proposed SVHCs
      New Candidate list
      Priority substances
About Pre-registration

About REACH fees
What is SIN list?

What is RoHS
?
     RoHS exemptions
What is 
WEEE?
What is Due Diligence?

What is RoHS2
?
What is New Approach?
New Legislative Framework?

What is the CE Mark?
What about Packaging
?
What about Batteries?
        
      JAPAN:      
Design for Environment
What is Japan RoHS?
What is J-Moss?

      CHINA:      
What is China REACH?
What is China RoHS?
      Phase 1
      Phase 2
What is Clean Production?

        
      KOREA:      
What is Korea RoHS?
What is EPR System?

    HYPERLINKS:   
red hyperlinks are links to official government documents (usually in .pdf)

              
top