|
What
is California Alternatives Assessment?
California Health & Safety Code § 25251
California Code of Regulations § 69301 (proposed)
Green Screen for Safer Chemicals
Alternatives Assessment (AA) is a requirement in
California's
Green Chemistry Initiative.
In September 2010, the Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) issued "Proposed Regulations for Safer Consumer Product
Alternatives" which were scheduled to become January 1, 2011.
However, following the
public comment period, a second set of
"Proposed
Regulations" were issued in November 2010 that were a substantive rewrite and
simplification of the earlier text. Implementation has been
delayed indefinitely while the Green Ribbon Science Panel is reconvened
to address the programmatic issues that have been raised.
|
What is
Tier I
AA? |
 |
Applies to products
that contain
Chemicals of Concern (COC) i.e. listed on
the Chemicals Under Consideration List or the Priority
Chemicals List |
 |
Required
when product is reformulated/redesigned to remove/reduce the COC or
when it is replaced with an alternative
product |
|
|
Not
required when product is reformulated without addition of
another chemical; use Chemical Removal
Confirmation Notification instead |
|
|
Not
required when product is withdrawn without being replaced
with another product; use Product Removal Confirmation
Notification instead |
 |
AA Notification must be
submitted before placing the reformulated, redesigned, or
replacement product in California stream of commerce |
 |
Tier I AA Report is substantially equivalent to the
"Green Screen For
Safer Chemicals", an open source, chemical hazard
screening assessment tool developed by Clean Production Action
(nonprofit organization) in consultation with US EPA and
industry groups |
 |
Evaluates
the parent chemical and all its feasible transformation
products for "hazard endpoints" (e.g. carcinogenicity, acute
aquatic toxicity, persistence, flammability) based upon
measurable thresholds (e.g. soil or sediment > 180 days) or
regulatory categories (from Prop 65, US EPA, EU, GHS) |
 |
Ranks
chemicals by "Benchmark" (1 - Avoid, 2 - Use but
Search for Safer Substitutes, 3 - Use but Opportunity for
Improvement, 4 - Prefer) by rating hazard endpoints
(very high, high, moderate or low) and deriving aggregate
score |
|
What is Tier II AA? |
 |
Required when product is listed as a
Priority Product |
|
|
Not
required if your product does not contain
the Priority Chemical |
|
|
Not required if product meets DTSC-specified "de minimis" level; use De Minimis
Exemption Request instead |
|
|
Not
required if Priority Chemical is removed from product without
the addition of
another chemical; use Chemical Removal
Intent/Confirmation Notifications instead |
|
|
Not
required if product is withdrawn without being
replaced with another product; use Product Removal
Intent/Confirmation Notifications instead |
 |
Must be performed by a Qualified Assessment Entity
(may be third-party or in-house) approved by the DTSC.
An accredited Lead Assessor must lead the
assessment. Assessments performed in-house
must be verified by a second Lead Assessor
who was not a participant. |
 |
Reported in three sequential documents: the Tier II
AA Work Plan, the Tier II-A AA Report,
and finally, the Tier II-B AA Report. |
|
What is the Tier II AA Work Plan? |
 |
Must be submitted within 180 days of listing as a
Priority Product |
 |
Includes preparer information such as names of those submitting, funding, directing, preparing,
and reviewing the AA; organizations providing expert
guidance; and the entire supply chain |
|
 |
Provides product information such as brand name,
description of product, and component that is the
focus of the AA |
 |
Specifies goal of the AA, alternatives to be
evaluated (e.g. different chemical, different
materials, product/process redesign), and life cycle
segments to be evaluated (e.g. raw materials,
manufacturing, transport, use, end-of-life,
recycling) |
 |
Describes assessment tools, models, software,
and methodology to be used; includes schedule for
completion, interim milestones, and list of deliverables |
 |
After approving the Work Plan, DTSC will assign due dates for the Tier II-A
AA Report and the Tier II-B AA Report |
|
What is Tier II-A AA?
|
 |
Priority Chemical and
the alternatives identified in
the Work Plan are evaluated and then compared for
chemical hazard traits and potential public and environmental exposure. |
 |
Chemical Hazard Assessment
factors include chemical and physical
properties, public health impacts, ecological
impacts, and chemical traits related to
environmental impacts. |
 |
If any of the alternatives contain a chemical that
exhibits a hazard trait, the Exposure Potential
Assessment is also required. |
 |
Exposure Potential Assessment
factors include
quantity, concentration and dispersive volume of the
chemical; consumer uses leading to human exposure;
product uses and disposal practices leading to
environmental releases.
|
 |
Alternatives that pose a greater chemical hazard
than the Priority Chemical do not need to be
evaluated under Tier II-B, provided that the
potential for exposure is the same or greater. |
 |
Tier II-A AA Report must
include a comparative matrix with easily understood
visuals, an executive summary geared to the public,
a description of manufacturing facilities and
full supply chain information. |
 |
Report must specify any adjustments to the Tier II-B
AA Work Plan, such as changes in alternatives or
life cycle segments to be evaluated, made as a result of the
hazard and exposure assessments
|
|
What is Tier II-B AA?
|
 |
Priority Chemical and
alternatives identified in the Tier II-A AA Report are evaluated and then compared for
product performance and life cycle outcomes. |
 |
Multimedia Life Cycle Evaluation
factors include
product performance and technological feasibility;
recyclability and renewable materials; consumption
of energy and water;
environmental impact on air, water, soil and wastes; economic
costs and impact on jobs |
|
 |
Alternatives that increase adverse impacts to public health
and the environment are rejected. |
 |
The selected
alternative must be functionally equivalent (performance and
functionality); technologically feasible (knowledge,
equipment and materials are available); and economically
feasible (comparable
rate of return for manufacturer, consumer cost not significantly increased). |
 |
Tier II-B AA Report must
include a comparative matrix with easily understood
visuals, an executive summary geared to the public,
a description of manufacturing facilities and
full supply chain information. |
 |
Report must provide a detailed implementation plan
for the selected alternative, including key
milestones and dates. |
 |
If
the selected alternative contains a Priority
Chemical, report must specify the DTSC
regulatory response needed to limit exposure and
reduce level of hazard. |
This summary of Alternatives Assessment (AA) is designed to provide you with an accurate, easy-to-understand
overview of the topic and does not constitute legal advice. The actual
standard in the original language should be reviewed and used for all
business, legal, and product compliance purposes.
RSJ's
awareness training is an excellent "first step" for
those just learning about a regulation. Our customized training helps
you understand your current responsibilities and business risks, as well
as the "big picture" of where the legislation is going so that you can
make better business decisions.
We are here to help you!
Back to Tutorial Index
Copyright © Jan
2011 -- All Rights Reserved
RSJ Technical
Consulting
PO Box 867705, Plano, Texas 75086 |